(C) COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT DISCIPLINARY SCHEME
The executive director, who is a member of the “enterprise”, misappropriates government funds by virtue of receiving a salary to perform a duty intended to protect citizens from judicial misconduct, instead dismisses all citizen grievances filed against judges for breaches of law and ethical duties
The commission itself is a contradiction in purpose — judges sit in judgment of their own conduct by being board members. See Article 4, sec. 32. and RCW 2.16.020. The “independence” label given the CJC is a blatant lie and fraud upon the people.