you're reading...
Site News

One Down, One to go! Justice Joel Penoyar retires after a little more than one year into his term

It appears that Justice Joel Penoyar has called it quits. In 2012 Penoyar ran unopposed for position one of the Division II Court of Appeals. Now he has called it quits according to the TheDailyWorld.com

I’d like to think “public pressure” from those reading Dirty Slick Joel Penoyar had a lot to do with it, but we will never know.

But just in case…. MY THANKS to those who took action to bring about Penoyar’s exit.

Judge Hull…. maybe you should be worried.

AND close behind will be Judge Jennifer Forbes.


4 thoughts on “One Down, One to go! Justice Joel Penoyar retires after a little more than one year into his term

  1. I’m not one to look a gift horse in the mouth, but I do recall doing a Google search on “Penoyar resignation” several weeks ago and not finding the article in question. Regardless of whether it has been backdated as a way to save face or it really did take place last November, I find the result to be extremely, extremely appropriate and hopefully many other folks will now be spared the heartaches of the consequences of having an individual performing the function of a judge who was so severely challenged by the task.

    Posted by Hugh Whinfrey | February 11, 2014, 1:02 am
  2. I agree, he is gone and his departure, however orchestrated means citizens can breath a little easier knowing a dishonest lawyer, who serves as a “JUSTICE” is off the “bench.”

    But we cannot rest because Joel Penoyar isn’t a freak occurrence… For example: http://jonathanturley.org/2009/02/03/what-the-hecht-prosecutors-boycott-new-judge-accused-of-prostitution-offenses/

    Posted by billscheidler | February 12, 2014, 10:27 am
  3. There’s nothing about him also resigning/retiring from the WSBA as far as I can see. Kinda seems sort of like a plea bargain because of that – he is on record ruling that folks with even unrelated ethics problems should have their professional licenses forcibly revoked for essentially the sake of the reputation of the profession itself (a case a while back involving a civil engineer who evidently was a sex offender, don’t recall the details but it I saw it on the Internet). There are several possible ways to interpret its retention. The negative is that it leaves the door open to possible future meddling, hopefully that’s not the intent.

    Posted by Hugh Whinfrey | February 18, 2014, 11:35 am


  1. Pingback: list 290 | My Blog - February 15, 2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: